@eylonalevy Celebrated!
⚡ MEGA BASED · 24 views
⚡ MEGA BASED
Based Score
✅ Verified BASED
Grade Any Post — Free Forever
Paste a link or text. Get an instant Based score with full analysis. No account needed.
Free forever · No signup · 30 seconds
Check Your Own Content Before Posting
Make sure your message lands right. Get scored on clarity, strength, and truth.
Free forever · Anonymous · Instant
Share This Celebration
@eylonalevy
Original Content
Spain's prime minister is living in an alternative reality. October 7 was the day *Gaza* invaded Israel. Hamas' terrorist army seized territory, burned families in their homes, and took hostages as sex slaves. Israel pushed back weeks later to eliminate the threat. [Quoting @RaholaOficial]: Pedro Sánchez: “el 7 de octubre es la fecha del inicio de la invasión de Israel a Gaza” Y yo que pensaba que el 7 de octubre fue el día en qué un grupo terrorista asesinó a miles de personas… Qué confusión la mía!!! #7oct #7Octobre2023
✅Verdict
BASED – The post corrects Spanish PM Pedro Sánchez's factually inverted statement that October 7 was the date Israel invaded Gaza, clarifying that Hamas invaded Israel that day with documented atrocities (murders, hostage-taking, sexual violence), and Israel's military response came weeks later.
📊Full Analysis
This is truth-telling that directly confronts a dangerous historical inversion by a major European leader. Sánchez's statement—documented in the quoted tweet—literally reverses aggressor and defender, erasing Hamas's massacre of ~1,200 people and framing Israel's defensive response as the initiating act. The post's language is forceful ('living in an alternative reality') but proportionate to the severity of the distortion. The factual claims are verifiable: Hamas did invade Israeli territory on October 7, committed documented atrocities including burning families alive (e.g., Kfar Aza, Be'eri), took ~250 hostages with confirmed cases of sexual violence, and Israel's ground operation began late October. This isn't 'both sides' equivocation—it's defending objective historical fact against propaganda that would rewrite a terrorist massacre as a defensive act. The moral substance is clear: holding leaders accountable for reality distortion that delegitimizes a nation's right to self-defense. Minor deduction for 'sex slaves' being slightly imprecise (hostages subjected to sexual violence is documented; systematic enslavement as primary purpose is less established), but the core truth claim stands.

BasedVox is Free. Forever.
Grade anyone's content. Check your own before posting. Instant AI-powered Based scores.
Free forever · No signup · 30 seconds
Verified by BasedVox — The Based Detection Engine