@SupriyaShrinate

@SupriyaShrinate's Post

Analyzed Feb 4, 2026 · 22 views

View Original Post

Based Score

15/100

❌ NOT BASED

See how YOU'D score

Watch your words get analyzed in real-time.

30 seconds. No signup.

Share This Unmask

@SupriyaShrinate

@SupriyaShrinate

Original Content

Hardeep ji, why would you even engage with an evil paedophile like Epstein? Doesn’t matter whether you were making the elevator pitch for Viksit Bharat or discussing the weather Yuck! [Quoting @HardeepSPuri]: The way Shri Rahul Gandhi has addressed parliamentarian and respected Sikh leader Sardar Ravneet Singh Bittu Ji, as a ‘Traitor’ crosses all boundaries of civility, decency and dignity.  It is entirely possible that he holds a deep grudge against Bittu Ji for choosing the policies of Vikas espoused by Modi Govt over the directionless Congress. But, that cannot ever justify such a slur against a proud Sikh whose own grandfather was slain by terrorists.  Calling someone a ‘traitor friend’ means he has betrayed his country. While Shri Gandhi may have many friends who are traitors, Shri Bittu is certainly not one of them.  Calling a distinguished Sikh a traitor without any basis is a slur on the entire Sikh community.  He should have known about the sacrifices made by our Guru Sahibs and our Sahibzaade to protect the Hindu faith before making such disrespectful remarks. He should’ve known about the love for the land Sikhism teaches every Sikh, and the valour with which Sikhs serve in the armed forces in large numbers to protect the sovereignty of Mother India before calling a disciple of Guru Sahibs a ‘traitor.’ His comment is a slur on every Sikh. It is an insult to the contributions made by Sikhs in every sphere. It is a slur on our faith and our love for the motherland. It is a slur on the sacrifice of Bittu Ji’s grandfather and former Punjab CM, Sardar Beant Singh Ji. Let us also not forget the desecration of Golden Temple in 1984 with the same mindset.

❌Verdict

NOT BASED – Deflects from legitimate criticism using guilt-by-association fallacy and moral panic.

See how YOU'D score

Watch your words get analyzed in real-time.

📊Full Analysis

đŸ”„ Based Retort: Context always matters. Business emails don't equal moral endorsement—by that logic, every diplomat who met with problematic figures is complicit in their crimes. The real issue here is Rahul Gandhi calling a respected Sikh parliamentarian a 'traitor' without basis. That's a direct, documented insult to a community that has sacrificed enormously for India. Deflecting to Epstein emails from years ago doesn't erase that disrespect—it just proves you can't defend the indefensible, so you're changing the subject.

Powered by BasedVox — The Based Detection Engine

See how YOU'D score

Free ‱ 30 seconds