@AvaSantina's Post
Analyzed Feb 4, 2026 · 20 views
Based Score
❌ NOT BASED
See how YOU'D score
Watch your words get analyzed in real-time.
30 seconds. No signup.
Share This Unmask
@AvaSantina
Original Content
Keir Starmer tells PMQs he regrets appointing Mandelson. He says if he knew then what he knows now, he would've been nowhere near government. NOTE: The relationship between Mandelson and Epstein had been reported prior to the appointment.
❌Verdict
NOT BASED – Factually false framing weaponized to suggest elite complicity in Epstein crimes, activating antisemitic blood libel tropes.
See how YOU'D score
Watch your words get analyzed in real-time.
đź“ŠFull Analysis
🔥 Based Retort: Starmer defended Mandelson at PMQs on September 10th when asked about previously known connections. He expressed regret on September 15th after Bloomberg revealed new details (2008 emails praising Epstein, suggesting he challenge his conviction). This isn't a cover-up—it's a leader responding to new information. Due diligence happened before the December 2024 appointment; ethics advisers warned of links. The timeline matters: defending based on known facts, then acting when new evidence emerged, is responsible leadership—not elite conspiracy.
Powered by BasedVox — The Based Detection Engine