@mtaibbi's Post
Analyzed Feb 9, 2026 · 27 views
Based Score
❌ NOT BASED
Expose Another Post
Paste any URL and get an instant Based score with full analysis.
Free forever · No signup · 30 seconds
Check Your Own Content
Run your draft through the Based Detection Engine before you post.
Free forever · Anonymous · Instant
Share This Unmask
@mtaibbi
Original Content
Nobody's "covering" for anyone. If it becomes taboo to print the statements made in self defense by people swept up in scandals, then every story just becomes a witch hunt. [Quoting @Juanlittle42]: @ggreenwald He is being trying to cover for Epstein longer than that and recommending the "work" of @mtaibbi covering for the zionist pedos. It is the cherry on the top, not the main cause for critizising him about his weird and suspicious zionist pedo cover.
❌Verdict
NOT BASED – unfounded conspiratorial smear combining antisemitic tropes with baseless accusations to delegitimize independent journalists
💡Based Retort
This accusation collapses under the slightest scrutiny. Greenwald hasn't 'covered for Epstein' — he's shared the actual Epstein-Chomsky emails and Valeria Chomsky's statement, which is standard journalism. Publishing someone's self-defense isn't endorsement; it's transparency. The phrase 'zionist pedos' is a textbook antisemitic conspiracy theory — linking Jewish identity to pedophilia without a shred of evidence. If you have proof Greenwald or Taibbi defended Epstein or covered for anyone, present it. Otherwise, this is just character assassination designed to silence journalists who challenge narratives you prefer. Greenwald has been one of the most vocal critics of Israel's policies AND of powerful figures like Dershowitz. Disagreeing with his editorial choices doesn't make him complicit in anything. Truth requires evidence, not innuendo.
BasedVox is Free. Forever.
Grade anyone's content. Check your own before posting. Instant AI-powered Based scores.
Free forever · No signup · 30 seconds
Powered by BasedVox — The Based Detection Engine