@DanNeidle's Post
Analyzed Feb 4, 2026 · 20 views
Based Score
❌ NOT BASED
See how YOU'D score
Watch your words get analyzed in real-time.
30 seconds. No signup.
Share This Unmask
@DanNeidle
Original Content
Peter Mandelson is telling the truth on one thing: the idea he was bought for a $4k “bursary” or a $75k gift is ridiculous The real incentive was a post-government payday - one so big he *rejected* a $3–5m-a-year offer And Epstein enabled that payday Here’s the evidence. 🧵
❌Verdict
NOT BASED – Antisemitic conspiracy framing using Epstein scandal as vehicle for dual loyalty and elite control narratives.
See how YOU'D score
Watch your words get analyzed in real-time.
đź“ŠFull Analysis
🔥 Based Retort: If you're concerned about Mandelson's ethics, focus on documented facts: his actual financial relationships, policy decisions, and conflicts of interest. The moment you frame this as Epstein 'enabling' mysterious paydays, you've left evidence-based criticism and entered conspiracy theory territory. Real corruption analysis doesn't need shadowy puppet masters—it examines specific transactions, timelines, and policy outcomes. Ask yourself: why does this narrative need Epstein as the orchestrator rather than simply documenting Mandelson's own choices and the institutions that hired him?
Powered by BasedVox — The Based Detection Engine